[R] shapiro wilk normality test
Frank E Harrell Jr
f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu
Sun Jul 13 20:07:37 CEST 2008
(Ted Harding) wrote:
> On 13-Jul-08 13:29:13, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
>> [...]
>> A large P-value means nothing more than needing more data. No
>> conclusion is possible. Please read the classic paper Absence of
>> Evidence is not Evidence for Absence.
>
> Is that ironic, Frank, or is there really a "classic paper" with
> that title? If so, I'd be pleased to have a reference to it!
>
> Thanks,
> Ted.
It's real. Full text is available to all:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485
It's one of the dozens of gems in the short statistics notes series in
the British Medical Journal.
Frank
--
Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chair School of Medicine
Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University
More information about the R-help
mailing list