[R] shapiro wilk normality test

Frank E Harrell Jr f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu
Sun Jul 13 20:07:37 CEST 2008


(Ted Harding) wrote:
> On 13-Jul-08 13:29:13, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
>> [...]
>> A large P-value means nothing more than needing more data.  No 
>> conclusion is possible.  Please read the classic paper Absence of 
>> Evidence is not Evidence for Absence.
> 
> Is that ironic, Frank, or is there really a "classic paper" with
> that title? If so, I'd be pleased to have a reference to it!
> 
> Thanks,
> Ted.

It's real.  Full text is available to all: 
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485

It's one of the dozens of gems in the short statistics notes series in 
the British Medical Journal.

Frank

-- 
Frank E Harrell Jr   Professor and Chair           School of Medicine
                      Department of Biostatistics   Vanderbilt University



More information about the R-help mailing list