[R] shapiro wilk normality test

[(Ted Harding)]

On 13-Jul-08 13:29:13, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
> [...]
> A large P-value means nothing more than needing more data.  No 
> conclusion is possible.  Please read the classic paper Absence of 
> Evidence is not Evidence for Absence.

Is that ironic, Frank, or is there really a "classic paper" with
that title? If so, I'd be pleased to have a reference to it!

Thanks,
Ted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 13-Jul-08                                       Time: 15:55:35
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------