[R-pkg-devel] Slowdown running examples since 4.2 on Windows

Barbara Lerner b|erner @end|ng |rom mtho|yoke@edu
Thu Jun 30 17:45:25 CEST 2022


Thanks for these suggestions.  I attempted to submit a slightly earlier 
version of my package a few weeks ago and saw the slowdown on winbuilder 
then, too.  I did not look into any further at that point.

I have tested it on a local Windows computer running 4.2.0 and I did not 
see the slowdown there.  Here are those results:

Name         user    system   elapsed

prov.json 1.11   0.24 2.19

prov.run    0.99    0.06 1.93

version  R version 4.2.0 (2022-04-22 ucrt)

os       Windows 10 x64 (build 19044)

system   x86_64, mingw32


Tomas Kalibera wrote on 6/30/22 10:09 AM:
>
> On 6/29/22 22:25, Barbara Lerner wrote:
>> I have a package that I want to submit an updated version for but the
>> examples run too slowly on win-builder since 4.2 came out.  I just
>> submitted the exact same tar.gz file to all 3 versions of R available on
>> win-builder and got the results shown below.  Notice the dramatic
>> slowdown from 4.1.3 to 4.2.1.
>>
>> I don't know how to go about tracking down the cause of this slowdown.
>> The examples are quite small.  I am reluctant to use \dontrun, but I am
>> not sure what else to do.
>
> Could you perhaps submit to Winbuilder several times (with some 
> non-trivial delay between the runs) to see if the very long execution 
> is reproducible?
>
> If so, the next step could be trying on a Windows machine with 
> interactive access, to reproduce, and if it is still so slow, checking 
> where the time is spent, using an R profiler, using some C profiler 
> (e.g. VerySleepy is free), comparing possibly to 4.1.3. It might be 
> useful or necessary to also do the profiling with a debug build of 
> Windows and/or the package, while the performance numbers will be 
> skewed, one would see the symbol names.
>
> If you wanted specific help, please send a reproducible example - 
> instructions how to run the code and which code.
>
> Best
> Tomas
>
>>
>> June 29 2:33 PM  - old release
>> * using R version 4.1.3 (2022-03-10)
>> i386 timings
>> name    user    system    elapsed
>> prov.json    3.28    0.33    5.19
>> prov.run    2.70    0.27    4.18
>>
>> x64 timings
>> name    user    system    elapsed
>> prov.json    3.51    0.27    4.93
>> prov.run    3.05    0.28    4.48
>>
>>
>> June 29 2:19 PM  - release
>> * using R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23 ucrt)
>> * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
>> name    user    system    elapsed
>> prov.json    16.98    8.81    26.82
>> prov.run    3.53    0.42    4.89
>>
>>
>> June 29  1:52 PM - devel
>> * using R Under development (unstable) (2022-06-28 r82534 ucrt)
>> * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
>> name    user    system    elapsed
>> prov.json    16.60     9.09    26.66
>> prov.run    3.57    0.22    4.70 I then ran the same timing script as 
>> win-builder uses on my Mac,
>> using Rscript and got these results: name    user    system  elapsed
>> prov.json       1.105   0.159   1.329 prov.run        0.890   0.103
>> 1.053 session_info reports:  version  R version 4.2.0 (2022-04-22)
>>    os       macOS Catalina 10.15.7  system   x86_64, darwin17.0 I then
>> installed 4.2.1 on my Mac. The time is a little slower but nothing like
>> the slowdown on Windows.
>> name    user    system  elapsed prov.json       1.286   0.230 3.080
>> prov.run        0.940   0.108   1.131  version  R version 4.2.1
>> (2022-06-23)  os       macOS Catalina 10.15.7  system   x86_64, 
>> darwin17.0
>>

-- 
<http://www.getpostbox.com>Barbara Lerner (she / her)
Professor
Computer Science Department
Mount Holyoke College

<http://www.getpostbox.com>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list