[R-pkg-devel] Rd cross-references ... NOTE, Undeclared packages ... in Rd xrefs
Jeff Newmiller
jdnewm|| @end|ng |rom dcn@d@v|@@c@@u@
Mon Jun 13 21:26:22 CEST 2022
I think the issue with dependencies arises because if this very usage.
Given how weak the relationship is with these packages, why not just omit links at all and just mention the packages by name?
On June 13, 2022 12:22:04 PM PDT, Ivan Krylov <krylov.r00t using gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:59:24 -0500
>Spencer Graves <spencer.graves using effectivedefense.org> wrote:
>
>> I probably should have just used "Suggests" and not
>> bothered this list with this issue.
>
>Why not use the \link{foo} form and let the HTML help system resolve
>the link at run time? Is it considered bad form to use unqualified
>links to help pages in other packages?
>
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list