[R-pkg-devel] How to structure LICENSE for multiple licenses?
Uwe Ligges
||gge@ @end|ng |rom @t@t|@t|k@tu-dortmund@de
Wed May 25 17:22:34 CEST 2022
On 24.05.2022 23:57, Steven Scott wrote:
> The current version of 'bsts' is released under the LGPL. I want to add
> the MIT license as an alternative.
>
> Right now the DESCRIPTION file contains the line
> License: LGPL-2.1 | file LICENSE
> and the file LICENSE contains a copy of the LGPL.
The latter is not needed as the license file is part of R, so the
declaration is sufficient.
> To add the MIT license I believe I need to modify it to be
> License: LGPL-2.1 | MIT + file LICENSE | file LICENSE
You actually need
License: LGPL-2.1 | MIT + file LICENSE
where the LICENSE file contains the CRAN template for the MIT license only
Best,
Uwe Ligges
> The syntax MIT + file LICENSE is because the MIT license is a template, and
> I need to fill in the template parameters in the LICENSE file.
>
> What's the right way to structure the LICENSE file to contain two
> licenses? Should I have two files (MIT.LICENSE, LGPL.LICENSE)? Can I just
> append the MIT license to the bottom of the LICENSE file?
>
> Thank you for reading.
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list