[R-pkg-devel] Two problems with fda
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Apr 26 18:46:17 CEST 2022
On 25/04/2022 8:24 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
>
> \value{
> These functions return either a standard \code{fRegress} fit object or
> or a model specification:
> \item{The \code{fRegress} fit object case:}{
>
>
> Aha, in a \value{} section, bare \items are supposed to mark components
> of the value, so they are automatically code. I think the fix for this
> is to make it an explicit \describe list:
>
> \value{
> These functions return either a standard \code{fRegress} fit object or
> or a model specification:
> \describe{
> \item{The \code{fRegress} fit object case:}{
>
> ... eventually ...
>
> }
An even simpler fix: don't mark the section title as an \item, i.e.
write as
\value{
These functions return either a standard \code{fRegress} fit object or
or a model specification.
The \code{fRegress} fit object case:
\item{field}{description .... }
Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list