[R] OFF TOPIC: Nature article on File Drawer Problem in Reserach
Bert Gunter
bgunter@4567 @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Wed Jul 24 17:43:28 CEST 2024
Thank you, but I should have said that this post was not meant to
provoke on-list discussion, as it *is* off topic. My Apologies. Please
keep any further discussion private to me only.
-- Bert
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 8:22 AM Ogbos Okike <giftedlife2014 using gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Bert,
>
> You have made my day!! Your post is a great help and very useful in my field.
>
> The paper is not among the off-the-shelf research output. Some of us, who get into unenviable conflict and disputation with some reverenced authorities in our field, understand the weight of the article. I had not even consumed half of it before I decided to thank you. I will quickly go back to see how it goes. I am sure it is going to be one of my best collections for the year!!
>
> Thank you very much. I often follow your posts, even if the topic does not concern me. Your tough comments always make sense to me. Today, I have gained something vital I should have lost if I overlooked it because of the subject heading: "
>
> OFF TOPIC"
>
>
> Please accept my warmest regards
> Ogbos
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:44 PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 using gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Again, this is off topic, not about statistics or R, but I think of
>> interest to many on this list. The title is:
>>
>> "So you got a null result. Will anyone publish it?"
>>
>> https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02383-9
>>
>> Best to all,
>> Bert
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help
mailing list