[R] Interpreting p values of gls in nlme

Bert Gunter bgunter@4567 @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Wed Jul 17 00:41:28 CEST 2024


Yikes!

This list is for help on R *programming*, not statistics per se,
although these do sometimes intersect. However, your query strikes me
as a request for a kind of statistical tutorial, which is OT here.
Just so you are aware...

R has a special interest group (SIG) for phylgenetics at
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo  . I think this
would be a better place for you to post, as relevant expertise should
be found there. However, I do not know how active that list is, so
maybe not. Good luck.

Cheers,
Bert

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:10 PM Roland Sookias <r.sookias using gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> I have undertaken some phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic regressions with
> gls() in nlme with single preictor variables. A p value is associated with
> the intercept (upper p value) and another with the predictor variable
> (lower). Which p value is important? What does it mean if the intercept p
> value is insignificant but the predictor is still significant?
>
> Thanks a lot, and sorry for my ignorance,
>
> Roland
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



More information about the R-help mailing list