[R] R 3.6.1

[Spencer Graves]

       What might be the likely outcomes of an attempt to reinstall 3.6.1?


       And might that depend on whether the current 3.6.1 was 
uninstalled first?


       Spencer


On 2019-07-17 07:17, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> It would never make sense for such messages to reflect normal and 
> expected operation, so hypothesizing about intentionally changing 
> stack behavior doesn't make sense.
>
> The default format for saveRDS changed in 3.6.0. There may be bugs 
> associated with that, but rolling back to 3.6.0 would just trade bugs.
>
> https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html
>
> On July 16, 2019 8:56:28 PM CDT, Jan Galkowski 
> <bayesianlogic.1 using gmail.com> wrote:
>> Did something seriously change in R 3.6.1 at least for Windows in terms
>> of stack impacts?
>>
>> I'm encountering many problems with the 00UNLOCK, needing to disable
>> locking during installations.
>>
>> And I'm encountering
>>
>>> Error: C stack usage 63737888 is too close to the limit
>> for cases I did not before, even when all I'm doing is serializing an
>> object to be saved with *saveRDS* or even *save.image(.)*.
>>
>> Yes, I know, I did not append a minimally complete example. Just wanted
>> to see if it was just me, or if anyone else was seeing this.
>>
>> It's on Windows 7 HE and I've run *R* here for years.
>>
>> My inclination is to drop back to 3.6.0 if it is just me or if no one
>> knows about this problem.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Jan Galkowski.
>>
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.