[R] "logical indexing, " [was] match() question or needle haystack problem for a data.frame
Fox, John
j|ox @end|ng |rom mcm@@ter@c@
Fri Oct 26 14:25:48 CEST 2018
Dear Knut,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces using r-project.org] On Behalf Of Knut
> Krueger
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 2:29 AM
> To: r-help mailing list <r-help using r-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [R] "logical indexing, " [was] match() question or needle haystack
> problem for a data.frame
>
> Am 25.10.18 um 16:13 schrieb peter dalgaard:
> >
> >
> > Yes: x[!(x$A %in% y$B),]
>
> Ok thats in my opinion a little workaround
Not a work-around but a solution. That is, one can't expect to find an existing function for every problem.
> why?:
>
> There is an
> = and !=
Actually == and !=
> < and >
>
>
> means the opposite is available between terms.
>
> why is there f.e no %!in%, %notin% or !%in%
>
> This would be more intuitive.
If you feel strongly about this, it's not hard to supply it:
> `%!in%` <- function(x, y) !(x %in% y)
> (1:4) %in% (2*1:4)
[1] FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE
> (1:4) %!in% (2*1:4)
[1] TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE
Best,
John
-----------------------------------------------------------------
John Fox
Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Web: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/
>
> Kind regards Knut
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-
> guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help
mailing list