[R] Is manova() correct for this analysis?
angelo.arcadi at virgilio.it
angelo.arcadi at virgilio.it
Tue Nov 24 00:58:59 CET 2015
Dear list members,
I have to perform the following analysis but I do not know which function in R
must be used. My guess is to use manova().
During an experiment I presented participants with some sound stimuli and I asked them to
modify two parameters of the sound (Centroid and Sound_Level_Peak) to reach a given
experimental goal. The initial sounds (preset sounds) had a value for those two parameters.
What I am interested in is whether participants' modifications of the two parameters of the
sound stimuli resulted in values actually different from the initial values of the parameters
of the preset sounds.
To give an idea, some rows of my data set are the following:
> head(scrd)
Stimulus_Type Centroid Sound_Level_Peak Preset
Stimulus_A 1960.2 -20.963 no
Stimulus_A 5317.2 -42.741 no
.....
Stimulus_B 11256.0 -16.480 no
Stimulus_B 9560.3 -19.682 no
.....
.....
Stimulus_A 1900.2 -18.63 yes
Stimulus_A 5617.6 -44.41 yes
Stimulus_B 12056.0 -17.80 yes
Stimulus_B 8960.5 -21.82 yes
This is the analysis I performed with manova():
> fit <- manova(cbind(Centroid,Sound_Level_Peak)~ Stimulus_Type*Preset, data=scrd)
> summary(fit, test="Pillai")
Df Pillai approx F num Df den Df Pr(>F)
Stimulus_Type 11 0.91888 106.629 22 2760 < 2e-16 ***
Preset 1 0.00343 2.371 2 1379 0.09378 .
Stimulus_Type:Preset 11 0.01155 0.729 22 2760 0.81348
Residuals 1380
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
>
If I am not wrong, these results say that for each stimulus type there is no difference
between the patterns of the two parameters in the preset and modified conditions.
Can anyone please tell me if I am correct or suggest how to perform in R such an analysis?
Thanks in advance
Best
Angelo
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-help
mailing list