[R] VIF threshold implying multicollinearity

[Collin Lynch]

No actually it is a quiet good paper! :)

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, John Kane <jrkrideau at inbox.com> wrote:

> +1
> I, originally,  read it as a stringent criticism of the first paper.
>
> John Kane
> Kingston ON Canada
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
> > Sent: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:12:43 +1200
> > To: cflynch at ncsu.edu
> > Subject: Re: [R] VIF threshold implying multicollinearity
> >
> >
> > On 27/07/15 13:36, Collin Lynch wrote:
> >
> >> The following sources discuss the issues generally and may be a goof
> >> pointer to the literature ...
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > I think that the foregoing merits fortune status! :-)
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Rolf
> >
> > --
> > Technical Editor ANZJS
> > Department of Statistics
> > University of Auckland
> > Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and
> family!
> Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
>
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]