[R] R for organization

[billy am]

Actually I would be interested to know which are the organisations that
does not allow R.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|


http://billyam.com  || http://use-r.com  || http://shinyserver.com (BETA)

SAS Certified Base Programmer for SAS 9
Oracle SQL Expert(11g)




On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Uwe Ligges <
ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:

>
>
> On 10.01.2015 15:42, Vlada Polovinska wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am interesting in R usage in a big organization. It is always top
>> question about how it is safe to use R working with sensitive data.
>> Because
>> of this I have decided to write to your team.
>>
>
> Actually you wrote to a public mailng list with thousands of readers.
>
>
>  I am waititng that you can
>> help me to understand what are the main reasons why some organizations
>> don't allow to use this open source and install packages which are very
>> useful for analytics. Could you please give me an explanation about risks
>> installing R packages? Of course, I would appreciate too if you will send
>> me some sources where I can find information about this instead of explain
>> in e-mail (if you don't have enough time).
>>
>
> To start reading, I suggest
> http://www.r-project.org/certification.html
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>  Thank you!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Vlada
>>
>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/
>> posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/
> posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]