[R] SOLVED: evaluate NA to FALSE instead of NA?

[S Ellison]

> Thanks Joshua and Sven - I completely forgot about which() .
Also 
na.omit(p[p<=0.05])

#and
p[p<=0.05 & !is.na(p)]

S.



*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}