[R] 0^0 computation in R : Why it is defined 1 in R ?
Prof Brian Ripley
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Mon May 26 18:42:33 CEST 2014
On 26/05/2014 13:16, ritwik_r at isical.ac.in wrote:
> Dear R helpers,
>
>
> today I found something interesting in R. 0^0 gives value 1 in R. But it
> is undefined in mathematics. During debugging a R code, I found it and it
> effects my program severely. So my question is why it is defined 1 in R?
> Is there any particular reason or its a bug in the R software?
Try reading the help:
Users are sometimes surprised by the value returned, for example
why ‘(-8)^(1/3)’ is ‘NaN’. For double inputs, R makes use of IEC
60559 arithmetic on all platforms, together with the C system
function ‘pow’ for the ‘^’ operator. The relevant standards
define the result in many corner cases. In particular, the result
in the example above is mandated by the C99 standard. On many
Unix-alike systems the command ‘man pow’ gives details of the
values in a large number of corner cases.
See §F9.4.4 of the C99 standard.
>
> Here is one demo:
>
> *************************************************
>
> ff=function(u){
> return( x^0 * u)
> }
>
> x=0
> zz=integrate(ff,lower=0,upper=1)$value
> zz
>
>
>
>> source('~/.active-rstudio-document')
>> zz
> [1] 0.5
>>
>
> *************************************************
>
> Looking forward to hear any response.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ritwik Bhattacharya
> Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
PLEASE do ....
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
More information about the R-help
mailing list