[R] Interpreting the result of a Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney U) test

Jim Lemon jim at bitwrit.com.au
Sat Oct 5 09:16:35 CEST 2013

On 10/04/2013 11:34 PM, S Ellison wrote:
> ...
 >> Got it! I agree it should had been more obvious to me... :)
> I wouldn't feel too bad about that. I've spent most of the last 25 years discovering the hard way that statistics is very much a field where things are 'obvious' only _after_ you know the answer...
A fortune ("hindsight") if I ever saw one.


More information about the R-help mailing list