[R] completing missing samples

[David Winsemius]

On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Joshua Wiley wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Joshua Wiley  
> <jwiley.psych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Eran,
>>
>> You have already gotten some suggestions from Michael, but I think
>> that Rich is correct to question the rational.

I hope we should question the rationale, and doubt that Rich has  
forsaken the rational.

>>  Any mechanism you
>> choose to replace the missing values will impose its structure on the
>> data. Veritate ab absurdo:
>
> or verum?  who remembers their Latin declensions?

Veritas is third declension.

-- 
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT