[R] efficient test for missing values (NAs)

Jim Holtman jholtman at gmail.com
Thu Oct 21 01:03:14 CEST 2010


?complete.cases

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 20, 2010, at 18:53, Ali Tofigh <alix.tofigh at gmail.com> wrote:

> What is the best way to detect whether or not a (potentially large)
> matrix contains missing values (NAs) or not? I use
>
> if (sum(is.na(x)) > 0) {...}
>
> are there more efficient ways?
>
> /Ali
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



More information about the R-help mailing list