[R] interpreting error estimate in SEM
Kathryn Barto
kathryn_barto at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 9 12:22:39 CET 2010
hi,
I'm using the sem package, and I want to make sure I'm interpreting the output correctly. Here is an excerpt of my output. When I report the MWD error, should I say that 59% of the variation in MWD is not explained by the model, or that 59% of the variation is explained, or something entirely different.
Parameter Estimates
Estimate Std Error z value Pr(>|z|)
NplantRoots 0.462029 0.120803 3.82466 1.3095e-04 plantRoots <--- N
...
CoError 1.000011 0.151850 6.58553 4.5325e-11 Co <--> Co
carbonateError 1.000009 0.156217 6.40142 1.5394e-10 carbonate <--> carbonate
MWDError 0.589788 0.092128 6.40185 1.5351e-10 MWD <--> MWD
Thanks
Kathryn
More information about the R-help
mailing list