[R] Graphics devices: windows() and x11() vs default
Martin Maechler
maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
Wed Nov 7 16:24:14 CET 2007
>>>>> "WS" == Wollkind, Steven <Steven.Wollkind at geodecapital.com>
>>>>> on Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:01:24 -0500 writes:
WS> I'm noticing some differences between making an explicit
WS> call to windows() to generate a graphics device and
WS> going with whatever R gives you when you just start
WS> plotting, which raises the question of just what the
WS> nature of the default device is. I've had a hard time
WS> researching this so far, so I'm asking the list.
getOption("device")
{the one you set by options(device = ...)
is your current default graphics device.
That is platform dependent, and from what you say below,
I assume you have to use MS Windows, where typically
this default device *is* equivalent to windows().
However, there are many ways to change this default,
by initialization code, or loading other packages which change
it or ...
Before you can get more help,
we need to see your
getOption("device")
and probably also
sessionInfo()
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
WS> Here are two code snippets:
WS> ###############################
WS> ## Snippet 1
WS> ###############################
WS> windows()
WS> layout(matrix(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),3,3,byrow=T))
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> ###################################
WS> ## Snippet 2
WS> ###################################
WS> layout(matrix(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),3,3,byrow=T))
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> plot(1:10)
WS> Run snippet 1, then resize the device. If your system is like mine the
WS> redrawing after resizing will be quick and nice. Then run snippet 2 and
WS> try the same thing. On my system I have to wait ~1 second per plot as
WS> they each get redrawn. My question boils down to "What is the nature of
WS> the default device you get without an explicit device generating call
WS> and why does it behave differently?"
WS> Now, this is obviously not that important in most cases, but I've been
WS> working with the cairoDevice package (and will be emailing its
WS> maintainer soon) and the graphics devices that it produces behave like
WS> snippet 2 and not snippet 1. As a first step to trying to correct this
WS> I'm simply trying to understand the differences between the devices you
WS> get with both methods.
WS> Thanks
WS> Steve Wollkind
WS> Steve Wollkind
WS> Associate Analyst
WS> Geode Capital Management, LLC
WS> 1 Post Office Square / 28th Floor / Boston, MA 02109
WS> steven.wollkind at geodecapital.com
WS> Tel: (617) 392-8991
WS> Fax: (617) 476-6389
More information about the R-help
mailing list