[R] prehistoric versions of R --> 1995!

[Paul Gilbert]

Martin Maechler wrote:

>>>>>>"UweL" == Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
>>>>>>    on Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:56:10 +0100 writes:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>
>    UweL> Petr Pikal wrote:
>    >> Hi
>    >> 
>    >> On 6 Feb 2006 at 15:57, ivo welch wrote:
>    >> 
>    >> Date sent:      	Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:57:30 -0500
>    >> From:           	ivo welch <ivowel at gmail.com>
>    >> To:             	Sean Davis <sdavis2 at mail.nih.gov>
>    >> Copies to:      	piet.vanremortel at gmail.com, r-help <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>    >> Subject:        	Re: [R] R loop
>    >> 
>    >> 
>    >>>>> data[ data$a == "name2" ]  # does not work and gives a weird
>    >>>>> result,  yuck
>    >>>> 
>    >>>> data[data$a=="name2",]
>    >>>> 
>    >>> 
>    >>> sorry about this.  I believe a few versions back, one could not subset
>    >>> data frames, so I did not even check what I wrote.  Works now.
>    >> 
>    >> 
>    >> It depends on what you consider few versions back. I started with R 
>    >> vesion 1.2.0 about 10 years 
>
>    UweL> I bet 200$ (or EUR) you have not used R 10 years ago. ;-)
>  
>
Is that an open bet or just for Petr?

>    UweL> People certainly remember the 1.0.0 release at the remarkable day 
>    UweL> 29-FEB-2000.
>    UweL> 1.2.0 was released in December 2000, about 5 years ago.
>    UweL> I started with 0.62.x in 1998.
>    UweL> The oldest version I found on CRAN is a pre-alpha R.sea.hqx for the Mac 
>    UweL> dated 07-Nov-1996.
>
>Eehm; that has a wrong date (or then it would not be pre-alpha):
>I've always entertained the prehistoric directory of R sources
>at ftp://stat.ethz.ch/Software/R/alpha/PreHistoric/
>and its oldest file is 
>         Name	           Size    Date        
>         R-0.1alpha.tar.gz 861464  Feb 12 1996 
>  
>
I'm pretty sure I was using R 0.16 in the fall of 1996 on Linux, which 
was when I got dse largely converted from S. I had a slightly  earlier 
version in the spring of 1996 on Solaris. (I think the numbering would 
have been 0.11 -0.15 in the spring of 1996.)  I don't think the 
numbering was the same on other platforms.

>(which will be 10 years coming Sunday -- what a jubilee!!)
>So, even that is not pre-alpha; and yes, that was a bit before CRAN existed. 
>
>Now to the pre-alpha history.  I've digged some more and found
>
>1) that the mac file mentioned above would have
>   correct date 'Nov 6 1995' (at least that's the date I saved
>   when I looked at the Auckland FTP server through Emacs ange-ftp).
>
>2) The oldest stuff that I have is all from 1995;
>   The source I (think I) had first used is dated June 20 1995;
>   notably the  R-unix-src.tar.gz with accompanying README and
>   INSTALL files
>   (There was also ./win subdirectory which I did not use, with
>    files all from July 15, 1995; AFAIK done by Robert Gentleman)
>
> I've now put a bit of these oldest files into
>  ftp://stat.ethz.ch/Software/R/alpha/PreHistoric/pre-alpha/
>
>3) I've kept an e-mail that Ross had sent me on July 28 with
>   two small patches to the (June 20) sources.
>   
>   Yes, chances are pretty high that I was the first one outside
>   of the Auckland(NZ)-community to actively use R.
>  
>
I wouldn't be really sure of that (but it's a fair bet).

> 
>Note it might be interesting to find even older sources, but that
>would most probably have to be by Robert and Ross (or a
>sysadmin at Auckland).
>  
>
I used to have some floppy disks somewhere...

Paul Gilbert

>
>Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>  
>
====================================================================================

La version française suit le texte anglais.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email message from the Bank of Canada is given in good faith, and shall not be
binding or construed as constituting any obligation on the part of the Bank.

This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}