[R] intercept value in lme
Chuck Cleland
ccleland at optonline.net
Wed Dec 6 18:31:12 CET 2006
victor wrote:
> It is boundend, you're right. In fact it is -25<=X<=0
>
> These are cross-national survey data (I was investigated 7 countries in
> each country there was 900-1700 cases).
> In fact, there was two level 2 variables, so:
>
> m1<-lme(X~Y,~1|group,data=data,na.action=na.exclude,method="ML")
> m2<-lme(X~Y+Z1+Z2,~1|group,data=data,na.action=na.exclude,method="ML")
>
> X is a life satisfaction factor combined from 2 other variables for each
> case separately, of course.
> Y - income per capita in household
> Z1 - unemployment rate in a country.
> Z2 - life expectancy in a country
> group - country
Victor:
What happens if you center Y, Z1, and Z2 so that 0 corresponds to the
mean for each? As it is, zero is a very unusual value for each of these
variables. Do you really want to estimate the value of X when income =
0, unemployment = 0, and life expectancy = 0? If I understand
correctly, I think that's why the intercept value looks unusual to you.
> I attach a similar model where after adding Lev2 predictors intercept
> value is even 22!
>
> I'm sure there is my mistake somwhere but... what is wrong?
>
>
>
> Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood
> Data: data
> AIC BIC logLik
> 31140.77 31167.54 -15566.39
>
> Random effects:
> Formula: ~1 | country
> (Intercept) Residual
> StdDev: 0.8698037 3.300206
>
> Fixed effects: X ~ Y
> Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value
> (Intercept) -4.397051 0.3345368 5944 -13.143698 0
> Y -0.000438 0.0000521 5944 -8.399448 0
> Correlation:
> (Intr)
> Y -0.13
>
> Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
> Min Q1 Med Q3 Max
> -6.3855881 -0.5223116 0.2948941 0.6250717 2.6020180
>
> Number of Observations: 5952
> Number of Groups: 7
>
>
> and for the second model:
>
> Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood
> Data: data
> AIC BIC logLik
> 31133.08 31173.23 -15560.54
>
> Random effects:
> Formula: ~1 | country
> (Intercept) Residual
> StdDev: 0.3631184 3.300201
>
> Fixed effects: X ~ Y + Z1 + Z2
> Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value
> (Intercept) 22.188828 4.912214 5944 4.517073 0.0000
> Y -0.000440 0.000052 5944 -8.456196 0.0000
> Z1 -0.095532 0.037520 4 -2.546161 0.0636
> Z2 -0.333549 0.062031 4 -5.377127 0.0058
> Correlation:
> (Intr) FAMPEC UNEMP
> Y 0.168
> Z1 -0.429 0.080
> Z2 -0.997 -0.188 0.366
>
> Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
> Min Q1 Med Q3 Max
> -6.3778888 -0.5291287 0.2963226 0.6260023 2.6226880
>
> Number of Observations: 5952
> Number of Groups: 7
>
> Doran, Harold wrote:
>> As Andrew noted, you need to provide more information. But, what I see
>> is that your model assumes X is continuous but you say it is bounded,
>> -25 < X < 0
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>> [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of victor
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:34 AM
>>> To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>> Subject: [R] intercept value in lme
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I've got a problem in fitting multilevel model in lme. I
>>> don't know to much about that but suspect that something is
>>> wrong with my model.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to fit:
>>>
>>> m1<-lme(X~Y,~1|group,data=data,na.action=na.exclude,method="ML")
>>> m2<-lme(X~Y+Z,~1|group,data=data,na.action=na.exclude,method="ML")
>>>
>>> where:
>>> X - dependent var. measured on a scale ranging from -25 to 0
>>> Y - level 1 variable Z - level 1 variable
>>>
>>> In m1 the intercept value is equal -3, in m2 (that is after
>>> adding Lev 2
>>> var.) is equal +16.
>>>
>>> What can be wrong with my variables? Is this possible that
>>> intercept value exceeds scale?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> victor
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
--
Chuck Cleland, Ph.D.
NDRI, Inc.
71 West 23rd Street, 8th floor
New York, NY 10010
tel: (212) 845-4495 (Tu, Th)
tel: (732) 512-0171 (M, W, F)
fax: (917) 438-0894
More information about the R-help
mailing list