[R] convergence in polr
C. Spanou
cs369 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Feb 24 20:03:27 CET 2004
I am really sorry. I was supposed to send it to the Splus users but by
mistake I sent to the R-users. Sorry once again
On Feb 24 2004, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Why have you sent a message about S-PLUS to R-help, one that has already
> been answered on S-news?
>
> There is no function nlminb in R.
>
> On 24 Feb 2004, C. Spanou wrote:
>
> > Hello splus-users, I am trying to fit a regression model for an
> > ordered response factor. So I am using the function polr in
> > library(MASS). My data is a matrix of 1665 rows and 63 columns (one of
> > the column is the dependent variable). The code I use is
> > polr(as.ordered(q23p)~.,data=newdatap)
> > but I am getting the following warning message singularity
> > encountered in: nlminb.1(temp, p, liv, lv, objective, gradient, bounds,
> > scale)
> >
> > I looked in the MASS help for nlminb and I found that for the function
> > nlminb(start, objective, gradient=NULL, hessian=NULL,
> > scale=1, control=NULL, lower=-Inf, upper=Inf)
> >
> >
> > when returning a warning message of singularity means that the
> > optimization algorithm thinks it can't make any further progress
> > because it has too many degrees of freedom. It usually means that the
> > objective function is either not differentiable, or it may not have an
> > optimum.
> >
> > So for my data an optimum can't be obtained.
> > Is this true?
> >
> > Can I ignore this warning message since what I want to find is values
> > for the boundaries? Will the values for the boundaries be accurate even
> > though I get the warning message?
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> > https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read
> > the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list