[R] R: Debian package and source

Peter Dalgaard BSA p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Wed Jun 18 19:01:30 CEST 2003


"David Andel" <andel at ifi.unizh.ch> writes:

> Hi
> 
> As Dirk said before, if you're running unstable, the official
> version is surely the best. If you're running testing though, you're
> probably better off using the apt sources listed in
> http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ReadMe since there are
> some dependency hassles with installing the unstable version on
> testing (at least I got tired of going through all the dependency
> stuff).
> 

BTW, is there a good reason to keep the "testing" distribution at
1.6.0? I would assume that at least you'd want to include patches up
to 1.6.2 rather than ship a version with known bugs. Not wanting to
get into the 1.7.x series is understandable, of course.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907




More information about the R-help mailing list