[R] Correlation with small N

[Christian Schulz]

Hello r-proffessionals,
this is not a special R-Question, but have anybody
a good reason for nonstatistican's why the interpretation of correlations  
with cases under 20-30 are dangerous !?

...i have got problems explain this without formula's and perhaps anybody
know a realworld example what point this problem !?


thanks for any suggestion or url/doc etc.
Christian Schulz



-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._