[R] dim enquiry
Peter Dalgaard BSA
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Wed Feb 17 16:23:24 CET 1999
Jonathan Rougier <J.C.Rougier at durham.ac.uk> writes:
> This is a minor question, but is there any difference between the two
> objects
>
> fred <- structure(1:10, dim = c(2,5))
>
> and
>
> fred <- structure(1:10, .Dim = c(2,5))
No:
R> dput(structure(1:10, dim = c(2,5)))
structure(c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), .Dim = c(2, 5))
R> dput(structure(1:10, .Dim = c(2,5)))
structure(c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), .Dim = c(2, 5))
> Should I be using one rather than the other? Thanks, Jonathan.
I think the dim= form is marginally better. .Dim gets internally
converted to dim anyway. (But don't ask me why dput represents it
using .Dim...)
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
More information about the R-help
mailing list