[BioC] DEXSeq update results change

Alejandro Reyes alejandro.reyes at embl.de
Mon Mar 31 23:10:51 CEST 2014


Dear Marco Marconi,

I think that was the version where we changed from our original method, 
the one described on the paper to the recent apporach, you fill find 
this details in the section "Methodological changes since publication of 
the paper".  As you might have noticed, the dispersions are very 
correlated as well as the p-values.

I don't think the change in the p-value, and therefore the p-adjusted 
value, since it is not changing dramatically.  The simplest thing would 
be to increase your FDR threshold a bit.

Best regards,
Alejandro

> Hello, After performing a general Bioconductor update to the new version, I
> noticed that now the DEXseq package 1.8.0 is giving me different results
> from prrevious version 1.6.0. As a start, its function print dots "..." on
> the stdout which was not done in the previous version. This is not a big
> issue, the problem is that now I am obtaining different results. Generally,
> the padjust values are bigger.
>
> For example this exon:
>
>                      a1       a2      a3       b1      b2       b3
> EXXXX        126     90      101     81      233     225
>
> gets different results:
>
> geneID,exonID,dispersion,pvalue,padjust,meanBase,log2fold(b/a)
>
> old version:
> EXXXX,0.0684906370633231,0.00256847378387803,0.0321347815544768,129.941383199307,-0.217272839643456
>
> new version:
> EXXXX,0.0928452378435829,0.00401881761350959,0.0587521235795571,129.941383199307,-0.213275654796358
>
>
> as you can see the old one has a padjust below 0.05 and the other above
> 0.05, which is a big problem.
>
>
> I had a look in the NEWS section of the DEXSeq package, but i couldn't find
> any information about major changes.
>
>
> thank you very much, regards,
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list