[BioC] asymmetry in up and down regulation
    Ben Bolstad 
    bolstad at stat.berkeley.edu
       
    Mon Aug 11 23:09:32 MEST 2003
    
    
  
I don't think that this is really a bias. There are probesets that have
been observed to perform much like the "official" spikeins for various
reasons. See
http://affycomp.biostat.jhsph.edu/whymore.html
for details. These probesets would be giving the asymmetry out in the
extremes of the plot you referred to.
Ben
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 14:47, Chris Paulse wrote:
> Figure 5 in the recent Nucleic Acids Research 2003, Vol. 31, No. 4 e15
> (http://nar.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/full/31/4/e15/GNG015F5) shows an 
> interesting asymmetry in the distribution of fold changes for non-spiked in 
> genes.  Can anyone comment on the reason for this?  Here, dChip has the 
> least amount of bias.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
-- 
Ben Bolstad <bolstad at stat.berkeley.edu>
http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~bolstad
    
    
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list